Day1

 

Q1

The way of life after this pandemic ends will be in the form of “the new normal”.

Things will be different in various aspects of humanities from the way we do business, the way we deliver education, the way we behave from day to day, in our interactions with other individuals.

Can you comment on how this “new normal” will be?

-Mazrura Sahani , Malaysia 

 

Q2

In combating COVID-19, WHO has recommended on maintaining the social distancing.

However, from the social-humanities point of view, do we mean to encourage physical distancing?

For example in a scenario:

Two people who are physically close, such as two strangers crossing the road, are not socially close.

On the other hand, two people who are physically separated by thousands of kilometres, such as a husband and wife, are socially close.

-Mazrura Sahani , Malaysia

 

Q3

Prof. Oosterbeek Luize "From Humankind towards Humanity, through epidemics and sociocultural cohesion"- You highlighted the importance of Dignity of human person in contempory time, what we can see from traditional responses to the pandemic is not dignity-relevant, so do you think what challenges we are having with the current responses of different countries to Covid-19 pandemic are from "dignity" perspective?

-Phuong Huynh , Vietnam

 

Q4

I have question to Prof. Hsiu-Hsi Chen

The problem of social disgust a Covid-19 risk group leading to the concealment of disease exposure information when receiving medical services resulting in infection of medical personnel.

How is the situation in Taiwan or other countries?

-Surachai Phimha , Thailand

 

Q5

Can you please share more clearly what's the implication of humanities addressing the Covid-19 pandemic, especially for Health Humanities in the country for example?

-Vo Van Thang , Vietnam

 

Q6

Existing country or big city lockdowns were seriously issued in Wuhan and some other Western countries for COVID-19 control at Community level. Please have more explanation:Is it ethically, socially and culturally accepted when we talk about Right to Life of humanity science at the moment?

-Vo Van Thang , Vietnam

 

 

Day2

 

Q1

In combating COVID-19, WHO has recommended on

maintaining the social distancing.

However, from the social-humanities point of view, do we mean to encourage physical distancing?

For example in a scenario:

Two people who are physically close, such as two strangers crossing the road, are not socially close.

On the other hand, two people who are physically separated by thousands of kilometres, such as a husband and wife, are socially close.

-Mazrura Sahani , Malaysia

 

Q2

The way of life after this pandemic ends will be in the form of “the new normal”.

Things will be different in various aspects of humanities from the way we do business, the way we deliver education, the way we behave from day to day, in our interactions with other individuals.

Can you comment on how this “new normal” will be?

-Mazrura Sahani , Malaysia

 

Q3

I have question to Prof. Hsiu-Hsi Chen

The problem of social disgust a Covid-19 risk group leading to the concealment of disease exposure information when receiving medical services resulting in infection of medical personnel.

How is the situation in Taiwan or other countries?

-Surachai Phimha , Thailand

 

Q4

Can you please share more clearly what's thebimplication of humanities addressing the Covid-19 pandemic, especially for Health Humanities in the country for example?

-Vo Van Thang , Vietnam

 

Q5

Existing country or big city lockdowns were seriously issued in Wuhan and some other Western countries for COVID-19 control at Community level. Please have more explanation:Is it ethically, socially and culturally accepted when we talk about Right to Life of humanity science at the moment?

-Vo Van Thang , Vietnam

 

Q6

Some people said pendemic crisis is a part of natural selelection. Learning from past epidemic and pandemic. What are the keys to be the chosen one?

-Patumrat Sripan , Thailand